1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 | package Torello.Java.Build; import Torello.Java.UnreachableError; import Torello.Java.ReadOnly.ReadOnlyArrayList; import Torello.Java.ReadOnly.ReadOnlyList; import static Torello.Java.C.BRED; import static Torello.Java.C.RESET; import Apache.CLI.CommandLine; import Apache.CLI.Option; import java.util.ArrayList; import java.util.stream.Stream; // This class/method is called on the very last line of 'ProcessMainMenuChoice' // This class only has a single static method. // // This code does indeed "handle" or "deal with" User-Input. It deals-with the specifi // User-Input that involves providing a list of Package Nick-Names at the Command-Line, so that // **ONLY** those particular packages (the ones **EXPLICITY** requested) are processed by this // Build-Tool, during a build. // // Code that involves handling User-Input is always a lot uglier to look at. It also involves // lots of "println" statements that can result from "unacceptable combinations" that may be // entered at the command line. // // This whole method only has a few lines of actual code, but (obviously) has dozens of lines of // comments that attempt to explain what is occurring. This is why this method is in a separate // method from the class "ProcessMainMenuChoice". // // All of the input parameters are passed from "ProcessMainMenuChoice". class ProcessNickNameArgs { static SelectedOptionsRecord process( final ReadOnlyList<BuildPackage> packageList, final String MENU_CHOICE, final Option selectedOpt, final ReadOnlyList<String> optionsWhichAcceptPkgNickNames, // THIS IS NOT A HACK, IT IS A ALTERNATIVELY PROPOSED WORK-A-ROUND to a PROBLEM THAT // I DON'T ACTUALLY HAVE THE TIME TO SOLVE AT THE MOMENT. // // This class is now being used in a second CLI Program. The latest and greatest // "Testing.java" needs to **RE-USE** the "ProcessNickNameArgs" class (this class) in // its own CLI-Based Application. In that application, there is no way to generate a // "PrintHelpRecord". // // THEREFORE, I HAVE TURNED THIS INTO A FUNCTIONAL INTERFACE, SO THAT THE CLASS // "Testing" can re-use this class (the one you are looking at "ProcessNickNameArgs"), // without having to create its own "PrintHelpRecord", which it simply CANNOT DO // BECAUSE IT IS A MUCH SIMPLER, STRIPPED DOWN, CLI-Program! // // OLD PARAMETER: final PrintHelpRecord phr, final MainMenuPrinter mainMenuPrinter, final CommandLine commandLine ) { // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // This part can only be done after getting the "MENU_CHOICE" // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // // There are only a few menu-options that accept a list of package nick-names... When a // a user specifies which packages he wants compiled or synchronized, he does so due to // and because of the value provided "speeding things up" and "making the build run // faster". // // When specifying an abbreviated list of packages that need to be re-compiled and // re-documented, the user gets to avoid sitting in his chair, wasting time, watching and // waiting as this Build-Tool re-compiles and re-documents **ALL PACKAGES** - even ones // whose Source-Code and Documentation hasn't been changed, or even touched, in six // months... // // Here are a few of the Options which allow a User to specify at the Command-Line a list // of package nick-names: // // "javac" (Option #1) Allows you to compile only the packages listed, if these names // are included. // // "pb" (Partial-Build Options) Also allow the ability to specify which User-Listed // Java-Packages will be synchronized to the Cloud. // // "jdu" (Option #3) Skip the Java-Doc Upgrade-Process for all packages, except the one // that you are currently modifying... // // NOTE: As is in the previous Line-Of-Code, the ReadOnlyList // 'optionsWhichAcceptPkgNickNames' is constructed inside class 'Generate' and / or // one of its sub-class helpers. final boolean pkgNickNamesPossible = optionsWhichAcceptPkgNickNames.contains(MENU_CHOICE); // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // "Extranneous Arguments" - Arguments which **DID NOT** map to an Apache.CLI.Option // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // // I simply cannot get Apache.CLI to allow for an Option that accepts ZERO, ONE or MANY // arguments. The possibilities with Apache.CLI seem to be either "ZERO or ONE" (an // optional argument) **OR** "ONE-or-MORE" (multiple, but-not-zero). Therefore, I sort of // have to rely on this "hack-y" thing where I check the "extra non-recognized" switches // in order to check for ZERO, ONE or MANY arguments. // // This is needed for the options that accept a Package-Nick-Name List, which as of // July 2024 include Menu-Options such as "-1" and "-pb" (explained in a previous comment, // a few lines above). final String[] nonApacheOption_Args = commandLine.getArgs(); // I can never tell (anywhere, when I'm coding!) if a list that is returned is going to be // null, or a zero-length-array / zero-length-list. You simply just (eventually) get used // to typing things like this: (someList == null) || (someList.size() == 0) // // You just forget whether the code you wrote to initialize your lists with values inside // of them, have been designed to assign the lists to 'null' when there is no data // available ... or if you have designed them to be assigned to zero-length-lists... // // I'm also getting used to typing 'final' everywhere when I know a variable just isn't // going to change. It takes a long while to get excited about using the keyword 'final' final boolean contains_NonApacheOption_Args = ((nonApacheOption_Args != null) && (nonApacheOption_Args.length > 0)); if (contains_NonApacheOption_Args) { // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // First Error-Scenario: Selected Main-Menu Option doesn't accept Package Nick-Names // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // // Note that at this point in the code, the list of Non-Apache-CLI-Recognized-Switches // hasn't even been checked against the list of valid Package Nick-Names. It is // altogether possible that these are mispellings, types or even erroneous switches // that do not even exist. // // Rather than generate some enormous and comphrensive list of all the things that the // user might have meant (or could have meant) with what he has typed at the terminal, // INSTEAD, the Main-Menu is printed, and the user is informed that his "Extra // Command-Line Switches" are either: // // 1) un-recognized // 2) (if they are Java-Package Nick-Names), they wouldn't be appropriate // to use, given the Menu-Option which he has entered. // // I am not going to worry about telling him which of these two has occurred. if (! pkgNickNamesPossible) { mainMenuPrinter.print_MainMenu_Options(); System.out.println( "You have passed one or more spurious or unrecognized options:\n" + BRED + "Unknown Command-Line Switches Include: " + RESET + '[' + String.join(", ", nonApacheOption_Args) + ']' + '\n' + "Note that if these are Package Nick-Names, the Menu-Option you have " + "selected is not a Menu-Option which accepts Package Nick-Names." ); System.exit(1); throw null; } // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // Error-Check 'nonApacheOption_Args' // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // // "Unrecognized Switches" are switches that were passed by the user, but don't seem to // "map" to any of the expressly-written switches created for this class. A switch // will always begin with a dash "-" character. // // "Unrecognized Packages" are text-strings that are passed at the command, and do not // begin with a dash, **AND, IN ADDITION** are also **NOT** valid Package Nick-Names // either. // // NOTE: If either of these two lists are non-empty, it is guaranteed that an error has // occurrred. Flagging this as an error will happen shortly afterwards. Because // the complex nature of Apache-CLI, there is one other possible location/source // into which an "extra switch" might have been placed, by Apache-CLI // "Switches" begin with the '-' character Stream.Builder<String> unrecognizedSwitchListB = Stream.builder(); // "Package Nick-Names" start with any other character :) Stream.Builder<String> unrecognizedPackageListB = Stream.builder(); TOP1: for (String arg : nonApacheOption_Args) // Switches begin with a dash. If this is a switch, it wasn't consumed by one of // the pre-specified Options. Therefore it must be "un-recognized" if (arg.startsWith("-")) unrecognizedSwitchListB.accept(arg); else // Else it must be a valid package nick-name. { for (BuildPackage bp : packageList) if (bp.nickName.equals(arg)) continue TOP1; unrecognizedPackageListB.accept(arg); } // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // Now, Error-Check Apache.CLI's little "commandLine.getOptionValues(selectedOpt)" // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // // This "Extra For-Loop" is only here to ensure that the error message which is // printed, includes all possible mistakes... // // this is where the Package-Nick-Names entered by the user were placed into the // an "Option-Value", rather than being sorted into the: // // commandLine.getArgs() // // This is, sort of, a real nightmare trying to understan where apache is placing // my options that were entered by the user. I have come to understand what has // happened, and I'm trying - desperately - to explain it as clearly as possible! // // REMEMBER - If the user has typed: // // 1) cloudshell@username$ java MyProject.Build SomePackage // // Then "SomePackage" will be sorted into "commandLine.getArgs()" // // Since he has not made a Menu-Option Choice, this is an error // // 2) cloudshell@username$ java MyProject.Build -1 SomeIncorrectPackageName // // Then "SomeIncorrectPackageName" is sorted into // "commandLine.getOptionValues(selectedOpt)" // // This is **ALSO** an error - this time because the package name was invalid // or misspelled (or something like that) TOP2: for (String arg : commandLine.getOptionValues(selectedOpt)) { for (BuildPackage bp : packageList) if (bp.nickName.equals(arg)) continue TOP2; unrecognizedPackageListB.accept(arg); } // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // Convert these two error-lists to arrays, and print if non-empty // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // // If either of these two lists that have been generated are NON-EMPTY, a User-Error // has occured final String[] unrecognizedSwitches = unrecognizedSwitchListB.build().toArray(String[]::new); final String[] unrecognizedPackages = unrecognizedPackageListB.build().toArray(String[]::new); // Print an error message and exit if either of these lists are non-empty if ((unrecognizedSwitches.length + unrecognizedPackages.length) > 0) { mainMenuPrinter.print_MainMenu_Options(); if (unrecognizedSwitches.length > 0) System.out.println( "You have passed one or more spurious or unrecognized options:\n" + BRED + "Unknown Command-Line Switches: " + RESET + '[' + String.join(", ", unrecognizedSwitches) + ']' + '\n' ); if (unrecognizedPackages.length > 0) System.out.println( "You have passed one or more unrecognized Package Nick-Names:\n" + BRED + "Unknown Package Nick-Names: " + RESET + '[' + String.join(", ", unrecognizedPackages) + ']' + '\n' ); System.exit(1); throw null; } } // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // Handle Package-NickNames / User-Specified Package-List // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // // If the Main-Menu Option is followed by a list of String-Tokens, the only possible // presumption is that they are a list of package nick-names. // // Remember, this is not the final / complete list of Nick-Names. // // This is, literally, part of the "hell" I have been through with this. // This String[]-Array will soon be merged with another String[]-Array before this method // exits. final String[] nickNames = commandLine.getOptionValues(selectedOpt); final boolean nickNamesProvided = (nickNames != null) && (nickNames.length > 0); // This error would (should !) automatically caught by Apache, and wouldnever reach this // point. This is just a variant of 'assert', and it's staying here for now. if (nickNamesProvided && (! pkgNickNamesPossible)) throw new UnreachableError(); // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // Merge: commandLine.getOptionValues(selectedOpt) **AND** contains_NonApacheOption_Args // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // // If you are wondering what "contains_NonApacheOption_Args", and how it was obtained, this // variable is initialized (and used) in the first few lines - at the top of this method! // It's value is (using Control-C and Control-V from the lines at the top of this method): // // final String[] nonApacheOption_Args = commandLine.getArgs(); // // Here we successfully merge: // 1) commandLine.getArgs(); // 2) commandLine.getOptionValues(selectedOpt) // // After **MUCH** arduous playing with all of this, I realized that the Apache-CLI was // actually sorting my arguments into two separate lists!!! // // ***************************** // OLD-COMMENTING FOR THIS CODE: // ***************************** // // A temporary list that is needed to merge the two different sources of Package Nick-Name // arguments. Since I simply cannot get Apache's Option-Argument thing to work with a // configuration of ZERO, ONE or MANY Option-Arguments, I have to presume that it isn't // possible. As such, the source of Package Nick-Names are the "getOptionValues" **AND** // **ALSO** the Extraneous-Options too! // // Merge those two lists, and then use that merged list as the package nick-names list. // Remember that only options "1" (javac) and "pb2" (partial-build 2) even accept package // nick-names lists. All of the others do not accept any arguments at all. final ArrayList<String> MERGED = new ArrayList<>(); if (nickNamesProvided) for (String pkgNickName : nickNames) MERGED.add(pkgNickName); if (contains_NonApacheOption_Args) for (String pkgNickName : nonApacheOption_Args) MERGED.add(pkgNickName); // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // Now we finally have the list of Package Nick-Names that was provided by the user!!! // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // // This whole thing is Super Complicated, rather than a few lines, because of some quirks // in Apache's Interpretation of how to control CLI Processing, versus how I would have // done things. // // Breath-Easy, it is all over! final ReadOnlyList<String> userProvidedNickNames = nickNamesProvided ? new ReadOnlyArrayList<String>(MERGED) : null; final ReadOnlyList<BuildPackage> userSpecifiedPackages = nickNamesProvided ? BuildPackage.nickNameArgVPackages(packageList, userProvidedNickNames) : null; // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // Oh, and one more thing - this is the list of "-OPT" needed to process Auxiliary-Options // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // // This list is used next. This list is returned / bubbled-up right here, to the method // and class which invoked this one - namely class 'CLI'. // // Class 'CLI' will pass this to constructor for 'AuxiliaryOptRecord' final ReadOnlyList<Option> optList = new ReadOnlyArrayList<>(commandLine.getOptions()); // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** // Return everything... // *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** *** return new SelectedOptionsRecord ( MENU_CHOICE, // final String userProvidedNickNames, // final ReadOnlyList<String> userSpecifiedPackages, // final ReadOnlyList<BuildPackage> optList // final ReadOnlyList<Option> ); } } |